Modern-day lithospheric geotherm beneath kbh and comparison with Geochemical classification diagrams of the mafic-ultramafic-felsic Evaluation of the proposed phase diagram using experiments from the
Conceptual model for the evolution of a mechanically decoupled
Experiments localized on phase map Comparison among the phase diagrams corresponding to different Fig. a.1. comparison of phase diagrams obtained from mc simulations for
Isochemical p-t phase diagram ('pseudosection') for mafic granulite
3. experimental phase diagram obtained by ichikawa et al. [16] forComparison between the experimental phase diagram by manabe et al. [14 Origin of basaltic magmasStream lithos phase music.
Lithos phase tracksComparison between theoretical and experimental results for phase Schematic phase relationships in pelitic rocks (fine lines) and maficMagma basaltic basalt magmas rhyolite andesite gabbro sio2.
![Fig. A.1. Comparison of phase diagrams obtained from MC simulations for](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/344314123/figure/fig4/AS:937682255503360@1600572279294/Fig-A1-Comparison-of-phase-diagrams-obtained-from-MC-simulations-for-the-MV-model.png)
Thermodynamic and trace element modeling. (a, c) simplified p‐t phase
Phases of the moon hand pulled lithos (2) — glimmer graphics printsMicrophotographs of the studied meta-mafic rocks. a alternation of Mafic vs. felsic: comprehensive comparison – geology inSchematics of the experiment. (a) the illustration of the phase diagram.
Granulite mafic z7 sample publicationClassification diagram of mafic and intermediate rocks of the zgounder Comparison of the experiments and their configuration in the test phase13 metamorphism of mafic and ultramafic rocks.
![Origin of Basaltic Magmas](https://i2.wp.com/s2.studylib.net/store/data/010201953_1-df44d0b0ffbdd633f6828bf9aca78cb1.png)
Major oxide (feototal, tio2, cao, al2o3, mgo, p2o5 and k2o vs. sio2
(a) tectonic overpressure op = 100×(p/p lithos −1), respectively. (bThe experimental results can be summarized in a phase diagram-like Conceptual model for the evolution of a mechanically decoupledExperiment and theory comparison. a-c experimental phase maps in.
(a) na2o + k2o versus sio2 diagram and (b) feot/mgo versus sio2 diagram(a) experimenta, imental setup for lensless imag. (b) image Melt-lithosphere interaction controlled compositional variations inComparison of experimental phase diagram with theoretical predictions.
![Comparison between the experimental phase diagram by Manabe et al. [14](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/1845140/figure/fig1/AS:654070775808002@1532954033640/Comparison-between-the-experimental-phase-diagram-by-Manabe-et-al-14-3-our.png)
Mafic vs. felsic rocks: the difference between mafic and felsic
Final 2-d lithospheric-scale inversion models for profiles lithos 1-3P–t phase diagram for ultramafic (and mafic) rocks in the model system .
.
![13 Metamorphism of Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks - Open Petrology](https://i2.wp.com/opengeology.org/petrology/wp-content/uploads/Ch13/cmsh-phase-diagram-v2-scaled.jpg)
![(a) Tectonic overpressure OP = 100×(P/P lithos −1), respectively. (b](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/profile/Jianfeng-Yang-5/publication/364583592/figure/fig4/AS:11431281095876455@1668046742264/a-Tectonic-overpressure-OP-100P-P-lithos-1-respectively-b-The-ratio-of-shear.jpg)
(a) Tectonic overpressure OP = 100×(P/P lithos −1), respectively. (b
![Experiment and theory comparison. a-c Experimental phase maps in](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/327403799/figure/fig1/AS:666823070580736@1535994417175/Experiment-and-theory-comparison-a-c-Experimental-phase-maps-in-laser-terahertz.png)
Experiment and theory comparison. a-c Experimental phase maps in
![Conceptual model for the evolution of a mechanically decoupled](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/334970134/figure/fig4/AS:11431281174662293@1689265598669/Conceptual-model-for-the-evolution-of-a-mechanically-decoupled-lithosphere-during.png)
Conceptual model for the evolution of a mechanically decoupled
![Comparison of experimental phase diagram with theoretical predictions](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/profile/Rene-Roij/publication/8441917/figure/fig2/AS:280869186097154@1443975840670/Comparison-of-experimental-phase-diagram-with-theoretical-predictions-The-symbols-denote_Q320.jpg)
Comparison of experimental phase diagram with theoretical predictions
![Comparison among the phase diagrams corresponding to different](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/profile/C-Perroni/publication/51239203/figure/fig3/AS:669324016635912@1536590689549/Comparison-among-the-phase-diagrams-corresponding-to-different-thicknesses-N-z-5-full_Q320.jpg)
Comparison among the phase diagrams corresponding to different
![Experiments localized on phase map | Download Scientific Diagram](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/profile/Ixchel-Ocampo/publication/320413501/figure/fig13/AS:549950120566786@1508129734745/Experiments-localized-on-phase-map.png)
Experiments localized on phase map | Download Scientific Diagram
![Phases of The Moon Hand Pulled Lithos (2) — GLIMMER GRAPHICS PRINTS](https://i2.wp.com/images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/612ea58bccf0651f826aa55f/1659796469257-OBFT6N2GZ56S9IM0XV30/Phase+2+wide.jpg)
Phases of The Moon Hand Pulled Lithos (2) — GLIMMER GRAPHICS PRINTS
![Evaluation of the proposed phase diagram using experiments from the](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/336886948/figure/fig3/AS:1096034340081669@1638326358416/Evaluation-of-the-proposed-phase-diagram-using-experiments-from-the-second-set-of.png)
Evaluation of the proposed phase diagram using experiments from the